The audience could apparently influence the performance before, after and during the event by uploding poetry online and in situ (see photo). It also served as video fodder as a cameraperson zoomed in on the viewers' faces, projecting the image -- or its fatly pixeled translation -- onto the floor of the space. Which is the kind of video usage in theatre that doesn't make you want to jam a pencil into your eye, but doesn't point to groundbreaking innovation either.
"AH!" could have actually done away with most of its fancy digitality, kept its chaotic, inspiring barrage of poetry lines and it would have been just as great of an "opera", although perhaps not an iPhone one. Apart from some new-agey nonsense ("synchrony grows as entities gather") some of its poems seemed to echo a lot of the issues we have dealt with in Techno-Cultures. They reflected on "the incalculable", on what may happen when "your communication system vastly differs from that of different life forms", whether something without meaning can make a mark and if there is anyone out there who is not a "casualty". But for all the interactive promises of this multimedia event the viewer felt strangely empty-handed, as if we ultimately needed to touch something that triggers the course of something else in order to feel like participants.
From multimedia opera to Japanese "synchronized webcam footage music video":
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfBlUQguvyw