Johanna Drucker's argument on the constraining, discipline-bound and ideological nature of models finds an unlikely example in Caster Semenya. This 18-year-old South African athlete had to go through tests to prove she belonged into one of the "tags" the heterosexist model establishes: <> and <>. The results are in and Semenya is -- for lack of a third "tag" - both <> and <>. Semenya's tag inhabitability is symptomatic of the exclusionary implications of classification, how naming forces a "reading, an intervention, an interpretive act" (16). The godfathers of the heterosexist system never accounted for the possibilities that lay between <> and <>, perhaps setting multiple generations of beings into paths/tags that they wouldn't have inhabited had they been offered other tags. Semenya can, of course, bear the < hermaphrodite. > tag (a "Scarlet tag"?), but its presentation will only take proper shape if it becomes a convention. Creating your own tag out of free will or anarchic experimentation will only trigger a complete lack of visual representation (see "P.S." bellow)
P.S. Something really interesting happened when I published this post. All of my "male" and "female" tags disappeared after being "automatically closed" with a "/" (as in < / female>). I had to leave a space between the "<" and the word to make them visible again. That strategy didn't work for the hermaphrodite tag, which needed an extra dot between the word and the ">" to make itself visible.
I will set my seven-year-old son to reading "Bodies that Matter" right away and hope it's not too late.
ReplyDelete